Red Light Cameras

[Rob Sullivan]

 

 

 

An emerging controversy in traffic enforcement, red light camera debates rarely find common ground.  Advocates argues that the cameras promote safety and save lives by discouraging last second decisions to plow through intersections.  Critics believe the that cities introduced the cameras as revenue producing tools with no consideration for public safety.  Of course, the privacy issues are obvious.  Downtowns that utilize the cameras begin to develop a big brother atmosphere.   

 

Both Houston and Los Angeles, two of the five largest American cities, recently shelved traffic cameras.  The Hollywood lights fell victim to the California budget crisis as local governments in that state look to reduce costs.  Each camera costs $250,000 to install.  Conversely, Houston remains at the epicenter of the strong Texas economy and energy industry.  However, the mayor and city council responded to growing echo of voter dissatisfaction with red light cameras.

 

Will other cities follow these dramatic examples or will red light cameras survive?     

[Pamela Ann Cameron]

I believe red light cameras to be inappropriate in many situations.  Take Davis Blvd., a very busy street near where I live in North Richland Hills.  The speed limit on this 4 lane road is, on some stretches, 50 miles an hour.  The yellow lasts for about 10 seconds.  If you go from 50 to 0 that quickly, the car behind you will hit you.  The road has numerous accidents.  I run the light because I don't want whiplash:) and a crumpled back fender.  The city must do a better job of timing the lights if they expect this process to increase public safety!